HP38 powde Fundamentals Explained

HP38 powde Fundamentals Explained

Blog Article

That currently being claimed probably I utilized the incorrect load knowledge. I used the load information with the 124 GR. BERB HBRN TP as I was heading by bullet pounds. I did recognize which the a hundred twenty five GR. SIE FMJ does use an increased load.

In the course of our last club buy, I mentioned HP38 being an 4th alternate if my other most well-liked powders weren't offered. They did not have any of my most popular powders and received an eight# jug of HP38. I'm now Practically away from my common powder and must start out utilizing the HP38.

What changed involving 1978 and now Using these powders, and Should they be the exact same, why were my hundreds bulging the internet in the brass with starting up load facts?

Any modify they make to some powder will change It truly is burn traits. One example is, BE86 is similar in just about every method to Electrical power Pistol, except for having an added flash suppressant, which will cause it to burn off a tad faster. I am unable to envision they're still building 231/HP38 precisely the same actual way they did in 1978.

I'm tests some 9mm reloads with HP-38. At this time we applied my spouse's Beretta PX four Storm Compact considering the fact that I at present even now have my LC9S Professional on lay absent but I believe that I might even see a similar slide cycling issue with my LC9S and my reloads.

I browse lots of post from loaders who use and like tightgroup but as I go thru the list of powders there are such a lot of that do precisely the same occupation.

I have applied AA #7 and Herco and gotten better velocities than W231, with Superb precision as well. I've some Ability Pistol to try with 230 gr bullets in my .forty five ACP. I count on to get very good outcomes Once i attempt PP in my 9mm, far too.

So .... speedier burning powder indicates slower muzzle velocity and slower burning powder implies more rapidly velocities, leaving medium burn off fee hp-38 powder powders for medium velocities inside the 800~1000 fps vary. I'm a "textual content ebook" reloader ... usually using the optimum burn off amount for a selected load. By deciding upon the right burn fee, you could manage lessen chamber pressures yet accomplish increased velocities, which also extends the lifetime of any gun.

Nothing there suggests They're exactly the same powders, or are even of the same manufacture, or have like demand weights in almost any distinct software.

I do shoot largely guide truncated cone bullets but definitely have consumed copious quantities of FMJ together just how. Till the powder shortage settles down we've been all victims of capturing what we can find.

as you receive through the ADI chart, and at least realize that the info was not intending to make novice loaders believe that cost weights can be "equal".

Having said that, you can find cases with guide bullet masses in revolvers in which you actually will need increased stress to drive bullets to HP38 powde obturate (bump up in diameter from chamber force). With numerous powder manufacturers earning powder ... there are generally a number of powders which have the optimum burn off charge to your application.

I don't Imagine your issue is connected with the usage of HP38/231 but instead the hardness with the commercially produced bullets.

HP38 / ww231 was my go-to powder for 38 Specific till it turned tough to purchase. In my quest for any load employing a 158 gr bullet that was exact although not punishing to my alloyed framed guns, I did loads of experimentation with lower demand weights of HP38.